ssshortlogo
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Health Professional Education
Letter to Editor
Novel Protocol
Novel Protocols
Original Article
Perspective
Protocol
Review Article
ssshortlogo
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Health Professional Education
Letter to Editor
Novel Protocol
Novel Protocols
Original Article
Perspective
Protocol
Review Article
ssshortlogo
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Health Professional Education
Letter to Editor
Novel Protocol
Novel Protocols
Original Article
Perspective
Protocol
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Editorial
5 (
2
); 37-39
doi:
10.25259/SRJHS_25_2025

Immersive learning in health professions education

Department of Paediatrics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

*Corresponding author: Latha Ravichandran, Department of Paediatrics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. latha@sriramachandra.edu.in

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Ravichandran L, Ramakrishnan TV. Immersive learning in health professions education. Sri Ramachandra J Health Sci. 2025;5:37-9.doi: 10.25259/SRJHS_25_2025

INTRODUCTION

Immersive learning is learning through deliberately designed artificial experiences that the learners perceive as direct and authentic, without an obvious intervening medium.[1] The experiences engage the learners holistically, integrating cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains and enabling learning through participation. As an educational approach, the experience itself becomes the primary vehicle for learning.[1]

IMMERSIVE LEARNING IN HEALTH PROFESSIONS EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Health professions education is challenged by increasing healthcare complexity, patient safety imperatives, and competency-based mandates that demand approaches that lead to learning that is transformative. Immersive learning is a pedagogical strategy that has emerged as one that offers learners realistic and interactive experiences that are reflective of real-world clinical practice.

Immersive learning shifts the focus from what educators teach to what learners experience. This shift aligns directly with competency-based education, where competencies are understood as integrated sets of characteristics that enable effective and superior professional performance.[2,3] Immersive learning cultivated these competencies through experience-rich environments that promote active engagement, reflection, and meaning-making.

Immersive learning is based on the Experiential Learning Theory. The actual experience is central to learning. As described by Kolb, and the knowledge building is created through transformation of experience.[4,5] Immersive education intentionally designs artificial experiences that are close to clinical realism while remaining educationally safe.[1] Several scholarly systematic reviews and meta-analyses in health professions education discuss the effectiveness of the immersive approach.[6,7] Emerging technologies such as the metaverse have further expanded discussions around immersive environments in healthcare education, highlighting challenges related to implementation, equity, and governance.[8]

CORE PRINCIPLES UNDERPINNING IMMERSIVE LEARNING

The experiential learning principle is the core of immersive learning.[4,5] Artificial experiences may be created using either the transformation of physical spaces into narrative-driven, role-based learning environments or virtual environments such as virtual reality (VR), augmented reality, and extended reality.[1] While technology can enhance immersion, it does not define it.

The PRAS model offers a useful framework for understanding immersive learning experiences and includes four key elements:

  • Presence: Learners experience a sense of physical and psychological engagement within the learning environment, supported by realistic interfaces and sensory feedback[1]

  • Role: Learners assume defined identities within the experience, fostering ownership, accountability, and deeper engagement[1]

  • Activity: Learning is driven by interactive tasks requiring decision-making, collaboration, and problem-solving rather than passive observation[2,3]

  • Scaffolding: Cognitive load is deliberately managed through structured guidance and feedback that support progressive learning and competence development.[4,5]

METHODS OF IMMERSIVE LEARNING

Immersion methods can be technological or non-technological. The non-technological methods are as follows:

  • Narrative-based learning

  • Theatre and dramatization

  • Role play

  • Standardized or simulated patient encounters

  • Simulated clinical scenarios

These approaches reinforce that immersion is defined by experiential authenticity rather than technological sophistication.[1] Health profession’s education is toward preparing competent, reflective, and system-ready practitioners, and immersive learning is a core pedagogical strategy,[4,5] which is aligned with competency-based education[2,3] and responsive to emerging immersive technologies and system realities.[6-8]

TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED LEARNING

Immersive learning using technology includes AR and VR as tools to improve the student’s experience. It eliminates visible boundaries and frames, allowing the learners to be fully enveloped in the virtual environment.

Augmented reality focuses on augmenting the physical world with digital images, videos, or experiences overlaid with computer-generated images and 3D models. An example is to superimpose live images of human veins for blood-drawing procedures or to show how the joints function during movement.

Non-immersive VR users view virtual content on a conventional display, where the users are aware of a visible boundary and frame between the virtual and the real world. Interactions occur through classical devices such as a mouse, keyboard, or joystick.

Semi-immersive VR involves a virtual environment but uses large-scale projection surfaces, making visible boundaries and frames less obvious to users. Interactions occur through freehand gestures or tangible interfaces.

Other tools used are Meta artificial intelligence (AI) and AI Avatars.

Meta AI uses an AI assistant to answer questions, generate images, provide creative ideas, and interact with users in a conversational manner.[8]

Meta Avatars allows users to create 2D stickers used in messages and stories and advanced 3D models for a personalized virtual experience.

HOW TO SUCCESSFULLY IMPLEMENT CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES?

Challenges

Simulation, virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality have now emerged as immersive learning modalities and enablers of Inter-Professional Simulation-based Education. Within Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME), immersive learning offers a unique opportunity to develop and assess complex team-based competencies essential for safe, high-quality patient care. By providing an environment for practice that can be recurrent with safe failures, it inculcates confidence in students and, with feedback that is continuous, leads to mastery. However, implementation has several challenges.[9]

Curricular mapping

A central challenge in implementing immersive learning is curricular alignment and integration across health professions programs. The diversity in learning outcomes, curricular structures, and assessment timelines makes longitudinal integration difficult. Immersive learning activities are often positioned discretely into the schedules of individual disciplines rather than deliberately mapped to inter-professional competencies, team-based Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), and milestones. This lack of mapping has been highlighted both in simulation-based education and inter-professional education reviews.[10,11]

Training frameworks

Many of the immersive learning initiatives lack robust training frameworks grounded in learning theory and inter-professional education principles. The scenarios that replicate the clinical complexity have to be mapped to the inter-professional learning outcomes, such as role clarification, shared leadership, and collective decision-making. Furthermore, assessment systems should evolve at a parallel pace with immersive learning methods and generate performance data for programmatic assessment and entrustment decisions.[11,12] Traditional assessment methods often fail to capture the full impact of immersive learning, as they emphasize memorizing lessons and standardized tests over experiential outcomes such as deeper understanding of the concepts or emotional engagement. Portfolio-based assessment helps to follow student progress through immersive outputs, reflective writing, and peer review. Analytics built into VR platforms supply real-time evidence on engagement, time spent on tasks, and decision pathways, delivering objective measures that extend beyond self-reported learning.

Faculty readiness

Faculty readiness represents a critical bottleneck. Effective immersive learning facilitation requires educators to move beyond discipline-specific teaching and adopt team-centered facilitation, observation, and debriefing practices. Faculty members require formal preparation training in inter-professional facilitation or assessment of team performance. Debriefing is a specific skill that needs to be inculcated. Competing clinical demands, limited protected time, and inadequate recognition for educational innovation further constrain sustained faculty engagement.[10,11] Teachers need a blend of technical proficiency and pedagogical design skills to implement immersive learning. Effective teaching requires immersive, well-designed learning experiences that engage the senses, employ gamification and narrative, empower learners, and are supported by scaffolding, differentiation, and assessment beyond traditional measures. It is necessary to adopt a supportive culture by encouraging teachers to experiment while rewarding early adopters.

Resource allocation: Human and infrastructure

Immersive learning using technology such as simulation, virtual reality, and augmented reality is frequently perceived as resource-intensive. Human resource requirements, including simulation educators, inter-professional faculty teams, instructional designers, and technical staff, need to be planned and recruited. Infrastructure investments in simulation centers or immersive technologies may occur without parallel investment in faculty development or curricular integration, leading to underutilization. There is constant pressure for institutional leaders to justify the utility and present return of investment, which is linked to outcomes such as student training, entrustment, patient safety, and quality.[9,10] The management leaders can allocate protected collaboration time by forming immersive-learning teacher teams, reducing individual workload through shared planning and pooled resources. The use of quick-start materials and pre-designed scenarios from platforms such as Google Expeditions or Immersive VR Education minimizes development time while building teacher expertise. Administrative incentives – such as stipends or reduced teaching loads during creation of the modules – will strengthen involvement by acknowledging and rewarding the additional effort involved.

Call to action

Immersive learning has a transformative potential, and institutions must adopt a systems-level, CBME-aligned strategy. It should be explicitly embedded within inter-professional competency frameworks, mapped longitudinally to team-based EPAs, and integrated into programmatic assessment models. Faculty development must occur in parallel, prioritizing competencies such as inter-professional facilitation, debriefing, and entrustment judgment. It should be supported by protected time and institutional recognition. Finally, resource allocation and investment should be reframed as an investment in team readiness, patient safety, and health system resilience rather than as an optional educational enhancement.[10,11]

References

  1. . What is immersive learning? In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference of the immersive learning research network (iLRN). Vienna, Austria: IEEE; . p. :1-5.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. . Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence”. Am Psychol. 1973;28:1-14.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Competency definitions, development and assessment: A brief review. Int J Acad Res Progress Educ Dev. 2020;9:95-114.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. . Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; . p. :20-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. . Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; . p. :137-234.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. . Versatile, immersive, creative and dynamic virtual 3-D healthcare learning environments: A review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10:e26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Virtual reality for health professions education: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e129590.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , . Exploring the potential of metaverse technology in healthcare: Applications, challenges, and future directions. IEEE Access. 2023;11:69686-707.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. . Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science. 2009;323:66-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ. 2010;44:50-63.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , , , et al. A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39. Med Teach. 2016;38:656-68.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306:978-88.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections